Results and Studies

The methods with which we gather and assess feedback about the effectiveness of CLTL are many. Although formal studies using statistical analysis of recidivism and other re-offending figures are very important to us, we eagerly await the informal feedback that arrives via assessments of CLTL as written by student-probationers. By nature, testimonials provide positive feedback that reminds us that what we do matters to people; testimonials also tell us when our strategies work.

All evaluations are valuable to us: they help us re-evaluate, allowing us to change texts or strategies and to keep those that are effective and eliminate those that are not. CLTL works, as these pages demonstrate.